Name suggestions
May. 19th, 2011 11:01 pmCurrently we lack a good name for #2. She can't come into this world as a mere #2. Every child is #1 in her own right. Neither can she be a Littler Bit. Again it indicates she's less than her sister who came first. She's a lot already, and so much more a wriggly bum than her sister was.
That said, in the real world #2 is equally nameless. We have narrowed the choice down to a list of 5 names. Now comes the difficult bit of choosing between them, and not waiting too long to do so.
That said, in the real world #2 is equally nameless. We have narrowed the choice down to a list of 5 names. Now comes the difficult bit of choosing between them, and not waiting too long to do so.
no subject
Date: 2011-05-19 09:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-05-20 05:20 am (UTC)That would have been my suggestion, too.
I don't quite remember but we had a list of five names, too, and then in the hospital, it was suddenly clear which one we'd choose. With Kingston, which you might remember as his working title, being two weeks early, we had to make our minds up very quickly!
no subject
Date: 2011-05-20 05:52 pm (UTC)It's a tradition over here to send out birth announcements very early on. Big Sis is making them, and I don't want her to have to work on a nameless card. We had Little Bit's name for ages, but Wriggles is much more difficult. I guess LB got the best name and we don't like to go for second best now.
no subject
Date: 2011-05-20 05:49 pm (UTC)We had an ultrasound this morning, and she just wouldn't keep still for a decent picture. ;-)
no subject
Date: 2011-05-20 10:17 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-05-20 05:53 pm (UTC)